John A Meinel wrote:
> Aaron Bentley wrote:
>> Oh, and of course it would be better if we detected x-bit support by
>> filesystem type, not by platform.
>
>
> Actually Cygwin bzr *does* support setting the executable bit. I think the
> problem is that if you do a checkout on cygwin, and then a status with win32
> native, we would have a problem.
Oh, and it actually sounds like he did a checkout using win32 native, and then
did 'bzr status' in cygwin, since that would cause all of the X-bits to become set.
He could do "cygwin-bzr revert" which should fix everything.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John A Meinel wrote:
> Aaron Bentley wrote:
>> Oh, and of course it would be better if we detected x-bit support by
>> filesystem type, not by platform.
>
>
> Actually Cygwin bzr *does* support setting the executable bit. I think the
> problem is that if you do a checkout on cygwin, and then a status with win32
> native, we would have a problem.
Oh, and it actually sounds like he did a checkout using win32 native, and then
did 'bzr status' in cygwin, since that would cause all of the X-bits to become set.
He could do "cygwin-bzr revert" which should fix everything.
John enigmail. mozdev. org
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iD8DBQFGaJrDJde BCYSNAAMRAq5CAK C3UjBP/ ZAt8kFm/ h9biZqMTz7BogCf eh4B /4axhxOc=
6LZjk1al4XRi45e
=kf6m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----