Alexander Belchenko wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Probably I found the root of the bug.
> If you look at the end of bundle with patch for hacking you could see:
>
> # properties:
> # bugs:
> # branch-nick: trivial
>
> The 'bugs' appears in revno.2446, I believe.
> Revno.2445 does not have such property.
> I uncommit my changes and commit it again with bzr.dev.revno.2445.
> Then I did new bundle and it pulled with bzr.0.14 without problem.
My guess is that this exposes a latent bug in bundles. It looks as if
some code is treating properties with empty values as if the property
does not exist.
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Belchenko wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Probably I found the root of the bug.
> If you look at the end of bundle with patch for hacking you could see:
>
> # properties:
> # bugs:
> # branch-nick: trivial
>
> The 'bugs' appears in revno.2446, I believe.
> Revno.2445 does not have such property.
> I uncommit my changes and commit it again with bzr.dev.revno.2445.
> Then I did new bundle and it pulled with bzr.0.14 without problem.
My guess is that this exposes a latent bug in bundles. It looks as if
some code is treating properties with empty values as if the property
does not exist.
Aaron enigmail. mozdev. org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iD8DBQFGLi260F+ nu1YWqI0RAhrRAJ 4kmobKhocxkO7WS 24grVK9sjC8EQCe I4Ge pglWxcdg=
QBN18VQppzLIDTM
=GzpP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----