On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 23:29 +0000, David Strauss wrote:
> *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 185200 ***
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185200
>
> Yes, I'm sure I'm looking at the right bug. Same exception != same
> issue. This issue deals with concurrent checkouts, and it's clear why
> you would encounter such a locking issue there. But it's a design flaw:
> users should be able to have multiple checkouts running concurrently.
>
> The other issue, in contrast, is about improper lock acquisition/release
> having nothing to do with concurrent operations.
The other issue is *not* about improper lock acquisition, it's about
concurrent checkouts; two bzr-svn processes trying to
use the same sqlite database.
The other bug does include some unrelated "bzr selftest" the original
reporter though might've been related, but if you read the entire bug
description, you'll see it's the same problem.
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 23:29 +0000, David Strauss wrote: /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 185200
> *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 185200 ***
> https:/
>
> Yes, I'm sure I'm looking at the right bug. Same exception != same
> issue. This issue deals with concurrent checkouts, and it's clear why
> you would encounter such a locking issue there. But it's a design flaw:
> users should be able to have multiple checkouts running concurrently.
>
> The other issue, in contrast, is about improper lock acquisition/release
> having nothing to do with concurrent operations.
The other issue is *not* about improper lock acquisition, it's about
concurrent checkouts; two bzr-svn processes trying to
use the same sqlite database.
The other bug does include some unrelated "bzr selftest" the original
reporter though might've been related, but if you read the entire bug
description, you'll see it's the same problem.
Cheers,
Jelmer samba.org/ ~jelmer/
--
Jelmer Vernooij <email address hidden> - http://
Jabber: <email address hidden>