Comment 10 for bug 260519

Revision history for this message
HPO (hpo) wrote :

thanks a lot.

Concluding, the original reporter (and I) were wrong about the usage of merge-into: We thought, we had to use merge-into for each merge operation, while only the first merge-into is needed. Subsequent merges work with the "simple" merge command. "join" seems much more adequate as a name.

I suggest closing this bug as INVALID and documenting the correct process within merge-into and join.