Concluding, the original reporter (and I) were wrong about the usage of merge-into: We thought, we had to use merge-into for each merge operation, while only the first merge-into is needed. Subsequent merges work with the "simple" merge command. "join" seems much more adequate as a name.
I suggest closing this bug as INVALID and documenting the correct process within merge-into and join.
thanks a lot.
Concluding, the original reporter (and I) were wrong about the usage of merge-into: We thought, we had to use merge-into for each merge operation, while only the first merge-into is needed. Subsequent merges work with the "simple" merge command. "join" seems much more adequate as a name.
I suggest closing this bug as INVALID and documenting the correct process within merge-into and join.