On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 05:52:41AM -0000, Daniel Herring <email address hidden> wrote:
> The attached patch (from git-format-patch) "works for me". It probably
> needs more testing. I also caution that conversions with it may not
> match earlier conversions; but the old conversions seem buggy to me.
Thanks, looks good. I want to give it a bit more testing, then I will
push it to my public integration branch and propose a merge request.
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 05:52:41AM -0000, Daniel Herring <email address hidden> wrote:
> The attached patch (from git-format-patch) "works for me". It probably
> needs more testing. I also caution that conversions with it may not
> match earlier conversions; but the old conversions seem buggy to me.
Thanks, looks good. I want to give it a bit more testing, then I will
push it to my public integration branch and propose a merge request.