Jelmer Vernooij пишет:
> On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 15:31 +0000, Alexander Belchenko wrote:
>> I don't think it's too different. IIRC loom keeps its own history as
>> hidden (dead) head in the same bzr repository.
> I don't want to put it in the same repository, that would require a new
> format which I'd like to avoid.
I don't see why it should be new repository format. Really.
Repository is just generic storage. Anybody can put there unrelated
data, as it today works as shared repository for unrelated branches.
Jelmer Vernooij пишет:
> On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 15:31 +0000, Alexander Belchenko wrote:
>> I don't think it's too different. IIRC loom keeps its own history as
>> hidden (dead) head in the same bzr repository.
> I don't want to put it in the same repository, that would require a new
> format which I'd like to avoid.
I don't see why it should be new repository format. Really.
Repository is just generic storage. Anybody can put there unrelated
data, as it today works as shared repository for unrelated branches.
--
All the dude wanted was his rug back