>> Note that only explorer (with my patch) has the separator between
>> release_level and serial. Why?
>
> I think this is because rc0 is invalid, Ian really should have used rc1
> instead. And quick check confirms this.
The trouble is that I don't want the UI to say "rc1" until I actually
release RC1. In the absence of rc1.dev, rc0 seems sensible enough. :-)
Alexander Belchenko wrote:
>> Note that only explorer (with my patch) has the separator between
>> release_level and serial. Why?
>
> I think this is because rc0 is invalid, Ian really should have used rc1
> instead. And quick check confirms this.
The trouble is that I don't want the UI to say "rc1" until I actually
release RC1. In the absence of rc1.dev, rc0 seems sensible enough. :-)
Ian C.