Comment 2 for bug 767332
Revision history for this message
| Alexander Belchenko (bialix) wrote Re: [Bug 767332] Re: [wishlist] mark branch as inactive or hidden | #2 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
a60fb26
(Get the code!)
Neil Martinsen-Burrell пишет:
> I'd rather not have to add colo-specific information to the branch.conf.
> I am leaning towards a convention for which branches not to show in
> colo-branches. I am leaning towards hiding branches whose name starts
> with "." as with the unix ls command. There could then be a --all
> option to show those branches. This will also allow those who wish to
> use a directory such as ".inactive" if they want to keep all of their
> inactive branches in one place.
>
> Can you let me know if that would be a satisfactory way to address this
> request?
That will be OK. And I think it will be good start. Thank you.
--
All the dude wanted was his rug back