Comment 1 for bug 767332

I'd rather not have to add colo-specific information to the branch.conf. I am leaning towards a convention for which branches not to show in colo-branches. I am leaning towards hiding branches whose name starts with "." as with the unix ls command. There could then be a --all option to show those branches. This will also allow those who wish to use a directory such as ".inactive" if they want to keep all of their inactive branches in one place.

Can you let me know if that would be a satisfactory way to address this request?