duplicate entries in Kernel IPv6 routing table

Bug #977725 reported by nitin yadav
10
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
network-manager (Ubuntu)
Expired
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

Hi,

i am getting duplicate default route (::/0) entries in kernel routing table .

route -6 -n
Kernel IPv6 routing table
Destination Next Hop Flag Met Ref Use If
fe80::/64 :: U 256 0 0 eth4
::/0 :: !n -1 1 2 lo
::1/128 :: Un 0 1 5162 lo
fe80::7ae7:d1ff:feec:ef2c/128 :: Un 0 1 24 lo
ff00::/8 :: U 256 0 0 eth4
::/0 :: !n -1 1 2 lo

Pls let me know if anyone having some idea on this .

Revision history for this message
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (cyphermox) wrote :

Do you also have messages like "ndisc_router_discovery() failed to add default route" in /var/log/syslog or /var/log/dmesg?

Please run the command 'apport-collect 977725' to add additional debugging information to this bug report.

Thanks in advance!

Changed in network-manager (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
importance: Undecided → Low
Revision history for this message
nitin yadav (nitinyadav91) wrote : Re: [Bug 977725] Re: duplicate entries in Kernel IPv6 routing table
Download full text (4.5 KiB)

hi Mathieu,
thanks for replying !!!
but i did no get messages like "ndisc_router_discovery() failed in all log
files.
This is the kernel problem because i execute same command in SUSE , i am
not getting duplicate entries .

SUSE system:
route -A inet6
Kernel IPv6 routing table
Destination Next
Hop Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
fe80::/64
:: U 256 0 0 eth0
fe80::/64
:: U 256 0 0 eth1
::1/128
:: U 0 125 1 lo
fe80::21f:29ff:fee5:5b40/128
:: U 0 0 1 lo
fe80::21f:29ff:fee5:5b42/128
:: U 0 0 1 lo
ff00::/8
:: U 256 0 0 eth0
ff00::/8
:: U 256 0 0 eth1

Linux system (in all version 2.6.32 to 3.2)
route -A inet6
Kernel IPv6 routing table
Destination Next Hop Flag Met Ref Use
If
fe80::/64 :: U 256 0 0
eth1
fe80::/64 :: U 256 0 0
eth3
fe80::/64 :: U 256 0 0
eth2
fe80::/64 :: U 256 0 0
eth0
::/0 :: !n -1 1 1
lo
::1/128 :: Un 0 1 6
lo
fe80::7ae7:d1ff:fe94:915a/128 :: Un 0 1 0
lo
fe80::7ae7:d1ff:fe94:915c/128 :: Un 0 1 0
lo
fe80::7ae7:d1ff:fe94:915e/128 :: Un 0 1 0
lo
fe80::7ae7:d1ff:fe94:9160/128 :: Un 0 1 0
lo
ff00::/8 :: U 256 0 0
eth1
ff00::/8 :: U 256 0 0
eth3
ff00::/8 :: U 256 0 0
eth2
ff00::/8 :: U 256 0 0
eth0
::/0 :: !n -1 1 1
lo

Regards,
Nitin Yadav

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <
<email address hidden>> wrote:

> Do you also have messages like "ndisc_router_discovery() failed to add
> default route" in /var/log/syslog or /var/log/dmesg?
>
> Please run the command 'apport-collect 977725' to add additional
> debugging information to this bug report.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
> Status: New => Incomplete
>
> ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Undecided => Low
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/977725
>
> Title:
> duplicate entries in Kernel IPv6 routing table
>
> Status in “network-manager” package in Ubuntu:
> Incomplete
>
> Bug description:
> Hi,
>
> i am getting duplicate default route...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
nitin yadav (nitinyadav91) wrote :

hi Mathieu,
thanks for replying !!!
but i did no get messages like "ndisc_router_discovery() failed in all log files.
This is the kernel problem because i execute same command in SUSE , i am not getting duplicate entries .

SUSE system:
route -A inet6
Kernel IPv6 routing table
Destination Next Hop Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
fe80::/64 :: U 256 0 0 eth0
fe80::/64 :: U 256 0 0 eth1
::1/128 :: U 0 125 1 lo
fe80::21f:29ff:fee5:5b40/128 :: U 0 0 1 lo
fe80::21f:29ff:fee5:5b42/128 :: U 0 0 1 lo
ff00::/8 :: U 256 0 0 eth0
ff00::/8 :: U 256 0 0 eth1

Linux system (in all version 2.6.32 to 3.2)
route -A inet6

Kernel IPv6 routing table
Destination Next Hop Flag Met Ref Use If
fe80::/64 :: U 256 0 0 eth1
fe80::/64 :: U 256 0 0 eth3
fe80::/64 :: U 256 0 0 eth2
fe80::/64 :: U 256 0 0 eth0
::/0 :: !n -1 1 1 lo
::1/128 :: Un 0 1 6 lo
fe80::7ae7:d1ff:fe94:915a/128 :: Un 0 1 0 lo
fe80::7ae7:d1ff:fe94:915c/128 :: Un 0 1 0 lo
fe80::7ae7:d1ff:fe94:915e/128 :: Un 0 1 0 lo
fe80::7ae7:d1ff:fe94:9160/128 :: Un 0 1 0 lo
ff00::/8 :: U 256 0 0 eth1
ff00::/8 :: U 256 0 0 eth3
ff00::/8 :: U 256 0 0 eth2
ff00::/8 :: U 256 0 0 eth0
::/0 :: !n -1 1 1 lo

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

[Expired for network-manager (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

Changed in network-manager (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Expired
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Related questions

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.