Please remove drools from precise
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
drools (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
Precise |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
The only reverse-depends of this package (eucalyptus) has been removed from Ubuntu.
Fixing this FTBFS will require a major version upgrade which seem pretty pointless as nothing will actually be using it.
Please remove it from the precise archive.
>>>>>>>
This is a semi-automatic report based on the latest archive rebuild results [1].
Apologies if it reaches you in error.
Excerpt from the buildlog:
[javac] DRLParser.
[javac] symbol : variable backtracking
[javac] location: class org.drools.
[javac] if ( backtracking==0 ) {
[javac] ^
[javac] DRLParser.
[javac] symbol : variable failed
[javac] location: class org.drools.
[javac] match(input,
[javac] ^
[javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
[javac] Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations.
[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
[javac] 100 errors
BUILD FAILED
/build/
/build/
Total time: 24 seconds
make: *** [debian/
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
*******
Build finished at 20120205-0425
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
The full buidlog can be found at https:/
[1] http://
Changed in drools (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → High |
Changed in drools (Ubuntu Precise): | |
assignee: | nobody → James Page (james-page) |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in drools (Ubuntu Precise): | |
status: | In Progress → Incomplete |
summary: |
- drools version 4.0.7-0ubuntu1 FTBFS on i386 in precise + Please remove drools from precise |
description: | updated |
Changed in drools (Ubuntu Precise): | |
status: | Incomplete → New |
assignee: | James Page (james-page) → nobody |
This version of drools is not compatible with antlr 3.2.
I look at a porting patch but not yet as I noticed that its only dep is eucalyptus for which is currently proposed for removal from the archive.
If that is the case then this package should be rm'ed as well.