SDAC - NRML fragility model

Bug #922104 reported by Muharem Hrnjadovic
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
OpenQuake (deprecated)
Fix Released
Medium
Muharem Hrnjadovic

Bug Description

[et=22h]
[at=]

Add a NRML fragility model for the Scenario Damage Assessment Calculator.

Tags: nrml risk sdac
tags: added: nrml risk
tags: added: sdac
John Tarter (toh2)
Changed in openquake:
milestone: none → 0.6.0
description: updated
Changed in openquake:
importance: Undecided → Medium
John Tarter (toh2)
summary: - NRML fragility model
+ SDAC - NRML fragility model
John Tarter (toh2)
Changed in openquake:
milestone: 0.6.0 → 0.6.1
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Muharem Hrnjadovic (al-maisan) wrote :

Fragility model examples discussed with Vitor:

    - continuous fragility functions: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/883073/
    - discrete fragility functions: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/883074/

Changed in openquake:
status: New → In Progress
assignee: nobody → Muharem Hrnjadovic (al-maisan)
Revision history for this message
Vitor Silva (vitor-silva) wrote :

Both structures look good to me.
Would it be possible to add that attribute that specifies the type of function being used in the continuous fragility functions? this would be specified only once, since it would be common to all of the functions.

Revision history for this message
Muharem Hrnjadovic (al-maisan) wrote : Re: [Bug 922104] Re: SDAC - NRML fragility model

On 03/15/2012 12:05 AM, Vitor Silva wrote:
> Both structures look good to me.
Thanks for the feedback Vitor!

> Would it be possible to add that attribute that specifies the type of
> function being used in the continuous fragility functions? this would
> be specified only once, since it would be common to all of the
> functions.
Of course! I forgot to add that to the continuous example..

Where should the "type" attribute sit? On the "ffs" tag?

Revision history for this message
Muharem Hrnjadovic (al-maisan) wrote :

On 03/15/2012 12:05 AM, Vitor Silva wrote:
> Would it be possible to add that attribute that specifies the type of
> function being used in the continuous fragility functions? this would
> be specified only once, since it would be common to all of the
> functions.
Vitor, please see line 17 in http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/884350/
Is that what you had in mind?

Revision history for this message
Muharem Hrnjadovic (al-maisan) wrote :

Discrete fragility functions should really resemble vulnerability functions: here's the format approved by Vitor: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/891792/

Revision history for this message
Muharem Hrnjadovic (al-maisan) wrote :

Latest discrete fragility model update: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/893376/

Changed in openquake:
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
Changed in openquake:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.