scim version 1.4.9-6 failed to build in oneiric

[Matthias Klose]

scim version 1.4.9-6 failed to build in oneiric
Link to failed build: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20110816/+build/2711059

Details about the rebuild:
http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-rebuild-20110816-oneiric.html

Direct link to the build log: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20110816/+build/2711059/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-amd64.scim_1.4.9-6_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz

This log snippet might be of interest, since it triggered the matcher 'Purging chroot-autobuild'.
Excerpt 2309 lines into the build log:

make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/scim-1.4.9'
# empty the dependency_libs field in .la files (bug 591628)
for FILE in debian/tmp/usr/lib/*.la; \
 do \
  sed -i "/dependency_libs/ s/'.*'/''/" $FILE; \
 done
# move libraries based on gtk_binary_version
mkdir -p debian/tmp/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/`pkg-config --variable=gtk_binary_version gtk+-2.0`/
mv debian/tmp/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/immodules \
  debian/tmp/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/`pkg-config --variable=gtk_binary_version gtk+-2.0`/
mv: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/immodules': No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_install] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/scim-1.4.9'
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch gave error exit status 2
******************************************************************************
Build finished at 20110823-0900
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Purging chroot-autobuild/build/buildd/scim-1.4.9

[Rolf Leggewie (r0lf)]

This is a multi-arch issue. I'm working on it but having other trouble with my Debian unstable pbuilder.

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640629

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

This bug was fixed in the package scim - 1.4.9-7

---------------
scim (1.4.9-7) unstable; urgency=medium

  * fix FTBFS from introduction of multi-arch. Closes: #640629, LP: #832945.
    full multi-arch support still needs further work.
 -- Steve Langasek <email address hidden> Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:51:00 +0000

[Rolf Leggewie (r0lf)]

Funny to see that Steve gets the credit in #2 when it's been my work, hm...