2 Sale Order views having same priority can confuse users

[Ferdinand]

in V5 we have picked rate and invoiced rate (see openerp demo)

[Ferdinand (office-chricar)]

and a field "Paid" would be useful to see the state of the "complete" flow

[Ravindra Mekhiya(OpenERP) (rme-openerp)]

Hello Ferdinand,

   I have checked the sale order tree view, but both the fields are present in the view. IMHO may be some customization might have been done at your end. Would you please update the code and recheck.

Thanks.

[Ferdinand (office-chricar)]

can't see picked/invoiced/paid in this view !?

[Ferdinand (office-chricar)]

we have 2 views
SO takes
* sale.top.quotations.tree
instead of
* sale.order.tree
why
I created the db yesterday

[Raphaël Valyi - http://www.akretion.com (rvalyi)]

Ferdinand, I lost time just like you with this and even reported wrongly a
similar bug.

The issue IMHO is that those 2 views sale.top.quotations.tree and
sale.order.tree
have the same default "priority". So, depending on your updates, OpenERP can
take the wrong view.
IMHO OpenERP SA should set a lower priority to the main view: ale.order.tree

Can we have such a patch applied please?
I know at least 3 people now that have been loosing a few hours because of
this.

Raphaël Valyi.

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Ferdinand @ ChriCar <
<email address hidden>> wrote:

> we have 2 views
> SO takes
> * sale.top.quotations.tree
> instead of
> * sale.order.tree
> why
> I created the db yesterday
>
> --
> [trunk] sale order - missing fields picked/invoiced in tree view
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658650
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to
> OpenObject Addons.
>
> Status in OpenObject Addons Modules: New
>
> Bug description:
> in V5 we have picked rate and invoiced rate (see openerp demo)
>
>
>

[Ravindra Mekhiya(OpenERP) (rme-openerp)]

Hello Dr.Ferdinand & Raphaël Valyi,

It has been fixed by revision 4308 <email address hidden> in
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-commiter/openobject-addons/trunk-addons-fixes.

Thanks.

[Ferdinand (office-chricar)]

there is a similar issue for o2m lists
IMHO we have no possibility to define which view should be taken in the xml code
workaround is possible manually defining the views for windows action

[Jay Vora (Serpent Consulting Services) (jayvora)]

Thanks Ferdinand and Raphael.
This has been fixed by revision 3876 <email address hidden>.
The O2M idea should come up as a wishlist.
Thanks RME.