BUG: scheduling while atomic: bash/12031/0x10000001

Bug #621371 reported by Lucian Adrian Grijincu
704
This bug affects 67 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
linux (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

I have nothing to add. I wasn't aware of the bug, but apport yelled at me that something went wrong.

ProblemType: KernelOops
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: linux-image-2.6.35-16-generic 2.6.35-16.22
Regression: Yes
Reproducible: No
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-16.22-generic 2.6.35.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-16-generic i686
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.23.
Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be restarted.
Architecture: i386
ArecordDevices:
 **** List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices ****
 card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USER PID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0: gringo-alpha 1476 F.... pulseaudio
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xefebc000 irq 45'
   Mixer name : 'SigmaTel STAC9200'
   Components : 'HDA:83847690,102801cc,00102201'
   Controls : 12
   Simple ctrls : 7
Date: Fri Aug 20 21:24:44 2010
Failure: oops
Frequency: I don't know.
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=c351140f-10f1-42e4-ab70-0af1449e367e
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Alpha i386 (20100803.1)
MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude D820
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-16-generic root=UUID=16d46cf5-c652-42dc-bd06-541bad35c1d2 ro quiet splash
RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.38
SourcePackage: linux
Title: BUG: scheduling while atomic: bash/12031/0x10000001
dmi.bios.date: 10/13/2006
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: A04
dmi.board.name: 0GF470
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.chassis.type: 8
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA04:bd10/13/2006:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeD820:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0GF470:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr:
dmi.product.name: Latitude D820
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.

Revision history for this message
Lucian Adrian Grijincu (lucian.grijincu) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Lucian Adrian Grijincu (lucian.grijincu) wrote :

The relevant stack trace (also in CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/54082134/CurrentDmesg.txt):

[ 515.665089] Pid: 1561, comm: dbus-daemon Not tainted 2.6.35-16-generic #22-Ubuntu
[ 515.665093] Call Trace:
[ 515.665103] [<c013e642>] __schedule_bug+0x62/0x70
[ 515.665110] [<c05c4340>] schedule+0x760/0x7a0
[ 515.665115] [<c05c44c2>] _cond_resched+0x32/0x50
[ 515.665120] [<c01fac3e>] anon_vma_prepare+0x1e/0x130
[ 515.665124] [<c01f62ad>] expand_downwards+0x1d/0x170
[ 515.665130] [<c01df709>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xd9/0x1c0
[ 515.665134] [<c01f640d>] expand_stack+0xd/0x10
[ 515.665139] [<c01f032b>] do_anonymous_page+0x2fb/0x310
[ 515.665143] [<c05c60fd>] ? _raw_spin_lock+0xd/0x10
[ 515.665147] [<c01f4170>] handle_mm_fault+0x340/0x400
[ 515.665150] [<c01f4339>] __get_user_pages+0x109/0x3f0
[ 515.665154] [<c01f46c5>] get_user_pages+0x55/0x70
[ 515.665159] [<c021d3d2>] get_arg_page+0x52/0xb0
[ 515.665165] [<c035996b>] ? strnlen_user+0x2b/0x60
[ 515.665169] [<c021d500>] copy_strings+0xd0/0x180
[ 515.665173] [<c021d5d9>] copy_strings_kernel+0x29/0x40
[ 515.665177] [<c021efba>] do_execve+0x19a/0x2c0
[ 515.665181] [<c05c6d37>] ? error_code+0x73/0x78
[ 515.665185] [<c0359a9a>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x3a/0x70
[ 515.665192] [<c0109d97>] sys_execve+0x37/0x70
[ 515.665196] [<c010316e>] ptregs_execve+0x12/0x18
[ 515.665200] [<c05c6634>] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb

Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Lucian Adrian Grijincu (lucian.grijincu) wrote :

It seems 2.6.35-17.23 has been published.

I believe all the duplicates of this bug were running 2.6.35-16.22

You should upgrade the kernel and check whether this triggers there too.

Revision history for this message
Lindinaldo (lindinaldo) wrote : Re: [Bug 621371] Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic: bash/12031/0x10000001

Ok. Thank you.

Lindinaldo Marinho | João Pessoa | Paraíba | Brasil

2010/8/20 Lucian Adrian Grijincu <email address hidden>

> It seems 2.6.35-17.23 has been published.
>
> I believe all the duplicates of this bug were running 2.6.35-16.22
>
> You should upgrade the kernel and check whether this triggers there too.
>
> --
> BUG: scheduling while atomic: bash/12031/0x10000001
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621371
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of a duplicate bug (621358).
>

Revision history for this message
Ritz (jonas-ritz) wrote :

I can confirm this issue is solved with the new kernel

Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Lindinaldo (lindinaldo) wrote :

Yes, it's ok.

Lindinaldo Marinho | João Pessoa | Paraíba | Brasil

2010/8/21 Ritz <email address hidden>

> I can confirm this issue is solved with the new kernel
>
> ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
> Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
>
> --
> BUG: scheduling while atomic: bash/12031/0x10000001
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621371
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of a duplicate bug (621358).
>

Revision history for this message
dino99 (9d9) wrote :

ive got this issue on my system too with 35-16-generic-pae kernel, but what its strange is that even booting on the next kernel 35-17 (which have not this issue) and having 35-16 still installed , produce this error. So ive uninstalled 35-16 from synaptic and now this error is gone.

when we search "scheduling" or "atomic" on launchpad bug , a bunch of report are daily reported and seem to be related to this new D+ service: bug report 617757 617988

Revision history for this message
Lucian Adrian Grijincu (lucian.grijincu) wrote :

I think you're mistaking.

This is an internal kernel issue and has nothing to do with DC++, or linuxdcpp.

Revision history for this message
Florent Delayen (tnedel) wrote :

I still have the message with the new kernel

Revision history for this message
Vsevolod Velichko (torkvemada) wrote :

Reproduced this bug on 2.6.35-17 i386 (linux-image-2.6.35-17-generic 2.6.35-17.23).
The humour of the "fix" is the following: -17 kernel doesn't catch any stack trace so I can't collect any debug info - there're no information in logs after reboot.

Revision history for this message
Florent Delayen (tnedel) wrote :

Now that's okay !

Revision history for this message
Monfort Florian (florian-monfort) wrote :

Thanks ;)

2010/9/2 Florent Delayen <email address hidden>

> Now that's okay !
>
> --
> BUG: scheduling while atomic: bash/12031/0x10000001
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621371
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of a duplicate bug (622124).
>
> Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> I have nothing to add. I wasn't aware of the bug, but apport yelled at me
> that something went wrong.
>
> ProblemType: KernelOops
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
> Package: linux-image-2.6.35-16-generic 2.6.35-16.22
> Regression: Yes
> Reproducible: No
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-16.22-generic 2.6.35.2
> Uname: Linux 2.6.35-16-generic i686
> AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.23.
> Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be
> restarted.
> Architecture: i386
> ArecordDevices:
> **** List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices ****
> card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog]
> Subdevices: 1/1
> Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
> AudioDevicesInUse:
> USER PID ACCESS COMMAND
> /dev/snd/controlC0: gringo-alpha 1476 F.... pulseaudio
> CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
> Card0.Amixer.info:
> Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xefebc000 irq 45'
> Mixer name : 'SigmaTel STAC9200'
> Components : 'HDA:83847690,102801cc,00102201'
> Controls : 12
> Simple ctrls : 7
> Date: Fri Aug 20 21:24:44 2010
> Failure: oops
> Frequency: I don't know.
> HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=c351140f-10f1-42e4-ab70-0af1449e367e
> InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Alpha i386
> (20100803.1)
> MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude D820
> ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-16-generic
> root=UUID=16d46cf5-c652-42dc-bd06-541bad35c1d2 ro quiet splash
> RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.38
> SourcePackage: linux
> Title: BUG: scheduling while atomic: bash/12031/0x10000001
> dmi.bios.date: 10/13/2006
> dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
> dmi.bios.version: A04
> dmi.board.name: 0GF470
> dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
> dmi.chassis.type: 8
> dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
> dmi.modalias:
> dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA04:bd10/13/2006:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeD820:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0GF470:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr:
> dmi.product.name: Latitude D820
> dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/621371/+subscribe
>

Revision history for this message
Vsevolod Velichko (torkvemada) wrote :

Unfortunately, I can't say the same :(
2.6.35-19.28 i386 generic kernel, all possible updates are installed — but system just went frozen at once and nothing could be found in logs.

Revision history for this message
zertyz (zertyz) wrote :

I believe this issue is not yet solved and I also believe that the bug #760082 is a duplicate of this, although there are more details: this only happens when we have a dual monitor with a second VGA display connected -- although, in my case, it is not always reproducible. If you are still affected by this bug, you may consider consulting the mentioned bug report.

Revision history for this message
Monfort Florian (florian-monfort) wrote :

On lun., 2011-04-18 at 17:18 +0000, zertyz wrote:
> I believe this issue is not yet solved and I also believe that the bug
> #760082 is a duplicate of this, although there are more details: this
> only happens when we have a dual monitor with a second VGA display
> connected -- although, in my case, it is not always reproducible. If you
> are still affected by this bug, you may consider consulting the
> mentioned bug report.
>

Except I've never had a second display connected ...

Revision history for this message
Monfort Florian (florian-monfort) wrote : Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

LinkedIn
------------

Bug,

I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.

- Florian

Florian Monfort
Student at Saint Sébastien Landerneau Private School.
Brest Area, France

Confirm that you know Florian Monfort
https://www.linkedin.com/e/kk64co-go5y88na-5z/isd/3015125166/o4MJSQ-8/

--
(c) 2011, LinkedIn Corporation

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.