ontology convention inconsistency

[Seif Lotfy]

we agreed on stuff like IMMESSAGE being being IM_MESSAGE
however its not the case
look at ur nmm.py and zeitgeist.py in the ontology folder

[Seif Lotfy (seif)]

@Mikkel will we ignore this CASE ? I think we can ignore it since we have a documentation for it. However the inconsistency kinda bothers me a bit.

[Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen (kamstrup)]

Well, it's not like its a huge issue. Just a minor cosmetic thing. I think that maybe the work required to get this nicely hooked in to the build system doesn't compare to the little gain code-wise...

[Seif Lotfy (seif)]

Then I will set it as won't fix or invalid :)

On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <
<email address hidden>> wrote:

> Well, it's not like its a huge issue. Just a minor cosmetic thing. I
> think that maybe the work required to get this nicely hooked in to the
> build system doesn't compare to the little gain code-wise...
>
> --
> ontology convention inconsistency
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575449
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in Zeitgeist Framework: New
>
> Bug description:
> we agreed on stuff like IMMESSAGE being being IM_MESSAGE
> however its not the case
> look at ur nmm.py and zeitgeist.py in the ontology folder
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/zeitgeist/+bug/575449/+subscribe
>

--
This is me doing some advertisement for my blog http://seilo.geekyogre.com