LSMGenGeo: non-uniform particle density when packing cylinders
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESyS-Particle |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
Gengeo-1.0 |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
When using LSMGenGeo to pack a cylinder with particles, it would appear that LSMGenGeo has a bias towards inserting larger particles near the top of the cylinder. I have noticed evidence for this in numerous UCS tests where the crown of the cylinder shows a greater propensity to fragment than the base of the cylinder (even when both ends are loaded at the same rate).
I've attached a script for creating a cylinder packing and a couple snapshots that clearly shows the bias towards more larger particles near the crown of the cylinder. The bias is most easily observed if the range of particle sizes is relatively small (e.g. 0.4 to 1.0 or 0.5 to 1.0) but the bias still exists for broader ranges of particle sizes (0.2 to 1.0).
Since this packing bias impacts upon the results of UCS simulations, I'm setting the importance of this bug to High.
Changed in esys-particle: | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
status: | Fix Released → Fix Committed |
Changed in esys-particle: | |
milestone: | none → gengeo-1.0-release |
Changed in esys-particle: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
The packing bias described in this bug has been fixed in revisions of LSMGenGeo later than rev. 1232. I have attached a snapshot showing a packing generated by rev. 1269 showing no evidence of the packing bias.