Several reports after 9.04 -> 9. 10 that the 'headless Java' is damaged

Bug #469867 reported by Chris Jones
16
This bug affects 3 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Ubuntu
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

After running a network upgrade from 9.04 to 9.10 dpkg reported that the 'headless jdk' was installed but not configured.
Attempting to configure it generated errors relating to alternatives and 'keytool'.
Removiwd all alternatives associated with java and attempted to reconfigure and the configuration reported good.
However the installation is still reporting problems with headless jdk and there seems to be a recursive failure.

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Oct 31 22:01:45 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage:
 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Package: openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b16-1.6.1-1ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
SourcePackage: openjdk-6
Title: package openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b16-1.6.1-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic x86_64

Revision history for this message
Chris Jones (crs) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Chris Jones (crs) wrote :

Attempted clarification :
... and there seems to be a recursive failure {with apport}.
 That is; It crashes when it tries to read (?) the the /var/crash file from the installation that points at the JDK.
 Clearing /var/crash of the jdk and apport crashes seems to leave a system that runs clean.

Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

this doesn't seem to be related to openjdk. there are some warnings, but nothing more

affects: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) → ubuntu
Revision history for this message
Fabio Marconi (fabiomarconi) wrote :

Hello
Is this problem present with the latest updated Karmic's or Lucid's packages?
Thanks in advance
Fabio

Changed in ubuntu:
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Chris Jones (crs) wrote :

I did not see a reoccurrence when updating from 9.10 to 10.04.

Revision history for this message
Fabio Marconi (fabiomarconi) wrote :

This bug report is being closed due to your last comment regarding this being fixed with an update. For future reference you can manage the status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow line and then choosing a new status in the revealed drop down box. You can learn more about bug statuses at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status. Thank you again for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please submit any future bugs you may find.

Changed in ubuntu:
status: Incomplete → Invalid
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.