Grub 1.97beta4 fails to set up correct Windows XP entry
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
grub2 (Ubuntu) |
Expired
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Binary package hint: grub
In installing 29oct2009 release, 64-bit Karmic, the new grub 1.97beta4 failed to correctly detect and create a new startup menu for one of two WinXP active partitions. Two menu entries were created in /boot/grub/grub.cfg but both contain the same the same UUID code, so only that partition can be loaded. For many years 'Legacy GRUB' has worked well, with gedit or even grubedit tools allowing more meaningful menu display and operation, but I suppose that's what you must expect from a Beta4 version.
If it can't be fixed very soon, an Update reversion to 'Legacy Grub' might be a possible solution, to encourage migration from dual-boot Windows ?
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Oct 31 11:08:30 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release amd64 (20091027)
LiveMediaBuild: Debian GNU/Linux 5.0.1 "Lenny" - Official Snapshot i386 LIVE Binary 20091005-14:14
NonfreeKernelMo
Package: grub (not installed)
ProcEnviron:
LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSign
SourcePackage: grub
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic x86_64
XsessionErrors:
(gnome-
(gnome-
(polkit-
(nautilus:2090): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences
(gnome-
Changed in grub2 (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | Rolf Leggewie (r0lf) → nobody |
status: | Incomplete → New |
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:24:45AM -0000, Bruce R wrote:
> In installing 29oct2009 release, 64-bit Karmic, the new grub 1.97beta4
> failed to correctly detect and create a new startup menu for one of two
> WinXP active partitions. Two menu entries were created in
> /boot/grub/grub.cfg but both contain the same the same UUID code, so
> only that partition can be loaded.
Could you please show the output of 'sudo os-prober'?
> If it can't be fixed very soon, an Update reversion to 'Legacy Grub'
> might be a possible solution, to encourage migration from dual-boot
> Windows ?
We aren't going to go back; GRUB Legacy was unmaintained and had a whole
different set of more or less unfixable bugs. At least the bugs in GRUB
2 show prospect of being fixable. :-)