Cannot open fiesta.xpm

Bug #35813 reported by Carthik Sharma
6
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
grub-splashimages (Debian)
Fix Released
Unknown
grub-splashimages (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

The package provides grub splash images (.xpm.gz files). One of those splash images, fiesta.xpm does not appear to a file of type .xpm. In fact, nautilus tells me the following:

The filename "fiesta.xpm" indicates that this file is of type "X PixMap image". The contents of the file indicate that the file is of type "plain text document". If you open this file, the file might present a security risk to your system.

Do not open the file unless you created the file yourself, or received the file from a trusted source. To open the file, rename the file to the correct extension for "plain text document", then open the file normally. Alternatively, use the Open With menu to choose a specific application for the file.

Also, another splash image, gentleblue has a Gentoo logo in it!!

Cheers!

Revision history for this message
In , Richard Cohen (richard-daijobu) wrote : (no subject)

Tags: patch

fiesta.xpm is missing the XPM header: Add as a first line

/* XPM */

and it displays OK.

Revision history for this message
In , Sergey Fedoseev (sirsigurd) wrote :

Why this bug isn't fixed yet? There is a working patch for a long time.

Revision history for this message
In , sean finney (seanius) wrote : grub-splashimages: can you please include this fix? pretty please?

Package: grub-splashimages
Version: 1.0
Followup-For: Bug #266846

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

hi, a "me too" report here,

you might think that this is only a superficial problem, but it renders
the text console completely unreadable. i am at a complete loss why
this hasn't even solicited a response from the maintainer(s)--let alone
why it hasn't been fixed given that you only need to add one line
to the top of the xpm file.

i would assume that this is just a case of MIA maintainers... but is
the grub team really MIA?

in any case, if i don't hear back by the weekend, i'll prepare an
NMU via the standard procedure.

 sean

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages grub-splashimages depends on:
ii grub 0.95+cvs20040624-17 GRand Unified Bootloader

grub-splashimages recommends no packages.

- -- no debconf information

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFDStmGynjLPm522B0RAuO7AJjKN1lT8mSxufEbjoIxVORrt/XEAJ0SWknH
ynoBTgDDGGbV38LdvNukfQ==
=tds+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Revision history for this message
In , Luis R. Rodriguez (mcgrof) wrote : Re: Bug#266846: grub-splashimages: can you please include this fix? pretty please?

It's me from the team who is responsible for this and I've just been
busy and have had no time to followup on it. I'll try to get it done
soon.

On 10/10/05, Sean Finney <email address hidden> wrote:
> Package: grub-splashimages
> Version: 1.0
> Followup-For: Bug #266846
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> hi, a "me too" report here,
>
> you might think that this is only a superficial problem, but it renders
> the text console completely unreadable. i am at a complete loss why
> this hasn't even solicited a response from the maintainer(s)--let alone
> why it hasn't been fixed given that you only need to add one line
> to the top of the xpm file.
>
> i would assume that this is just a case of MIA maintainers... but is
> the grub team really MIA?
>
> in any case, if i don't hear back by the weekend, i'll prepare an
> NMU via the standard procedure.
>
> sean
>
> - -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
> APT prefers testing
> APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
> Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
>
> Versions of packages grub-splashimages depends on:
> ii grub 0.95+cvs20040624-17 GRand Unified Bootloader
>
> grub-splashimages recommends no packages.
>
> - -- no debconf information
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD4DBQFDStmGynjLPm522B0RAuO7AJjKN1lT8mSxufEbjoIxVORrt/XEAJ0SWknH
> ynoBTgDDGGbV38LdvNukfQ==
> =tds+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-grub-devel mailing list
> <email address hidden>
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grub-devel
>

Revision history for this message
In , sean finney (seanius) wrote :

hi luis, et al,

On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:34:07PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> It's me from the team who is responsible for this and I've just been
> busy and have had no time to followup on it. I'll try to get it done
> soon.

okay. in the meantime, i'm following through with my previous
commitment to do an NMU.

following standard NMU procedures, i've just sent an upload into the
7-day DELAYED queue on gluck. the only difference introduced
in this change is the addition of the line

/* XPM */

to the top of the gzipped copy of fiesta.xpm. a point of advice for
future uploads of grub-splashimages: there's no reason to have these
files gzipped in the source archive, as (a) it makes it impossible for
me to provide you with a sensible patch, and (b) the tarball containing
them is gzipped anyway. you could always have debian/rules gzip them
in the binary debs too, so there would be not noticable difference
for people who installed the packages. but this is a somewhat
superficial change, so i'll leave it to you to decide whether
or not it's worthwhile.

 sean

Revision history for this message
In , sean finney (seanius) wrote : Fixed in NMU of grub-splashimages 1.0.0

tag 266846 + fixed

quit

This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 10:53:38 -0400
Source: grub-splashimages
Binary: grub-splashimages
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: <email address hidden>
Changed-By: sean finney <email address hidden>
Description:
 grub-splashimages - a collection of great GRUB splashimages
Closes: 266846
Changes:
 grub-splashimages (1.0.0) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non Maintainer Upload.
   * add an /* XPM */ header to fiesta.xpm, as otherwise not only would
     grub not show the image, but the console would be completely corrupted,
     rendering ttyS0 almost unusable (closes: #266846).
Files:
 f87df21a212bc7077296a4027daced87 609 admin optional grub-splashimages_1.0.0.dsc
 9fa1db37136115752401d877d48b7a45 291182 admin optional grub-splashimages_1.0.0.tar.gz
 2855c1e6d93f2f0b0a95db974b86c7c5 292172 admin optional grub-splashimages_1.0.0_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDUSkfynjLPm522B0RAgPFAJ4lcu6Bk1prUpik9pGPk6kpnvmLwgCeK/Ss
O3ZQTiqfgsM5cjXCN9h/l8A=
=zR9m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Revision history for this message
Carthik Sharma (carthik) wrote :

The package provides grub splash images (.xpm.gz files). One of those splash images, fiesta.xpm does not appear to a file of type .xpm. In fact, nautilus tells me the following:

The filename "fiesta.xpm" indicates that this file is of type "X PixMap image". The contents of the file indicate that the file is of type "plain text document". If you open this file, the file might present a security risk to your system.

Do not open the file unless you created the file yourself, or received the file from a trusted source. To open the file, rename the file to the correct extension for "plain text document", then open the file normally. Alternatively, use the Open With menu to choose a specific application for the file.

Also, another splash image, gentleblue has a Gentoo logo in it!!

Cheers!

Revision history for this message
In , Simon Paillard (simon-paillard) wrote : grub-splashimages: fiesta.xpm.gz already fixed in testing and unstable

found 367202 1.0
forcemerge 266846 367202
thanks bts

Hi Fabien,

The bug you reported is indeed present in sarge, and has been already
reported in #266846 and fixed for testing and unstable in october 2005.

If you want to correct this on your sarge system, just add by hand the
line below as the first line for fiesta.xpm.gz
/* XPM */

Thanks for you report.

--
Simon Paillard

Revision history for this message
In , Krzysztof Burghardt (burghardt) wrote : Bug#266846: fixed in grub-splashimages 1.1.0

Source: grub-splashimages
Source-Version: 1.1.0

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
grub-splashimages, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

grub-splashimages_1.1.0.dsc
  to pool/main/g/grub-splashimages/grub-splashimages_1.1.0.dsc
grub-splashimages_1.1.0.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/grub-splashimages/grub-splashimages_1.1.0.tar.gz
grub-splashimages_1.1.0_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/grub-splashimages/grub-splashimages_1.1.0_all.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Krzysztof Burghardt <email address hidden> (supplier of updated grub-splashimages package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:08:47 +0200
Source: grub-splashimages
Binary: grub-splashimages
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Grub-Devel List <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Krzysztof Burghardt <email address hidden>
Description:
 grub-splashimages - a collection of great GRUB splashimages
Closes: 266480 266532 266846 273847 276195 366115 367202 383231
Changes:
 grub-splashimages (1.1.0) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New co-maintainer
   * All file was re-compressed with gzip -9 --best
   * Add six new splash images
   * Included homepage in long description
   * Updated README (closes: #266532, #366115, #383231)
   * Removed grubconf form suggestions (closes: #276195)
   * Suggests grub only on i386 and amd64 (closes: #273847)
   * Removed gentleblue.xpm.gz because it contains Gentoo logo (closes: #266480)
   * Fiesta theme is fixed (closes: #266846, #367202)
Files:
 12a37b1bffc74b13edc2d4d9e70832a9 617 admin optional grub-splashimages_1.1.0.dsc
 0b85f54c4b90d4e44b4d5efc236253bf 545451 admin optional grub-splashimages_1.1.0.tar.gz
 7e5dd40e58d93897e75edb654494c310 545700 admin optional grub-splashimages_1.1.0_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGaWHn+C5cwEsrK54RAlP8AKCc5zt/e62B36D4au/3Ig9Yp4oErgCfbEDm
ji362tepgBIKaFUtCJSHJ5A=
=WR3v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Revision history for this message
In , Krzysztof Burghardt (burghardt) wrote : change owner of bugs to me

owner 405657 !
owner 285321 !
owner 328630 !
owner 270073 !
owner 285321 !
owner 383231 !
owner 266846 !
owner 367202 !
owner 366115 !
owner 276195 !
owner 273847 !
owner 266532 !
owner 266480 !
owner 417461 !
thanks
--
Krzysztof Burghardt <email address hidden>
http://www.burghardt.pl/

Revision history for this message
Matti Lindell (mlind) wrote :

fixed in gutsy.
gentleblue splash has been removed too, so be aware if you're using it currently and upgrade to gutsy.

Changed in grub-splashimages:
status: New → Fix Released
Changed in grub-splashimages:
status: Unknown → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
In , Debbugs Internal Request (owner-bugs) wrote : Internal Control

# A New Hope
# A log time ago, in a galaxy far, far away
# something happened.
#
# Magically this resulted in the following
# action being taken, but this fake control
# message doesn't tell you why it happened
#
# The action:
# Bug archived.
thanks
# This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs
# administrator

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.