The number of subtasks should be recursive
Bug #335114 reported by
Lionel Dricot
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTG |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Bertrand Rousseau |
Bug Description
The number of subtasks was recently added in the title of a parent task.
I think it should have a recursive count of the subtask. Currently, you will see :
Changing the bulb (1)
-> Buying the bulb
-> Do a light bulb benchmark
-> Be sure it should be changed
I expect to see (3). The (1) seems counter-intuitive to me. What do you think ?
Changed in gtg: | |
assignee: | nobody → bertrand-rousseau |
Changed in gtg: | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
I think you're right. I don't think it's implemented this way on
purpose right now, we probably forgot to count (sub-)subtasks...
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Lionel Dricot <email address hidden> wrote: /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 335114
> Public bug reported:
>
> The number of subtasks was recently added in the title of a parent task.
>
> I think it should have a recursive count of the subtask. Currently, you
> will see :
>
> Changing the bulb (1)
> -> Buying the bulb
> -> Do a light bulb benchmark
> -> Be sure it should be changed
>
> I expect to see (3). The (1) seems counter-intuitive to me. What do you
> think ?
>
> ** Affects: gtg
> Importance: Undecided
> Assignee: Bertrand Rousseau (bertrand-rousseau)
> Status: New
>
> ** Changed in: gtg
> Assignee: (unassigned) => Bertrand Rousseau (bertrand-rousseau)
>
> --
> The number of subtasks should be recursive
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gtg
> developers, which is the registrant for gtg.
>
> Status in Getting Things Gnome!: New
>
> Bug description:
> The number of subtasks was recently added in the title of a parent task.
>
> I think it should have a recursive count of the subtask. Currently, you will see :
>
> Changing the bulb (1)
> -> Buying the bulb
> -> Do a light bulb benchmark
> -> Be sure it should be changed
>
> I expect to see (3). The (1) seems counter-intuitive to me. What do you think ?
>
--
Bertrand Rousseau
Place communale 1, 1450 Chastre, Belgium
e-mail : <email address hidden>
tel : +32 485 96 69 86