pangomm misses libpangomm-1.4.la

Bug #274732 reported by Johannes Schmid
10
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
pangomm (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: libpangomm-1.4-dev

This files needs to be installed to be able to build another software depending on libpangmm, like glom

Revision history for this message
Alessio Treglia (quadrispro) wrote :

libgtkmm-2.4-dev just depends on libpangomm-1.4-dev

Revision history for this message
Murray Cumming (murrayc) wrote :

Alessio, yes, but I don't understand what point you are trying to make.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package pangomm - 2.14.1-1

---------------
pangomm (2.14.1-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream release.
    - Drop 01_devhelp_path_fix.patch, merged upstream.
  * Tighten Build-Depends on libcairo2-dev >= 1.8.2-2 and
    libglib2.0-dev >= 2.18.0 to help experimental buildd figure out the
    correct dependencies.

pangomm (2.14.0-2) experimental; urgency=low

  * Use POSIX standard regex classes in sed trick in debian/rules.
  * Fix symlink ``usr/share/doc/pangomm-1.4'' to reference correct place.
  * Add 01_devhelp_path_fix.patch to fix all gtkmm to pangomm.
  * Use ``usr/share/doc/pangomm-1.4'' as URL in doc-base to match upstream
    behavior.
  * Continue to ship *.la in libpangomm-1.4-dev. It seems to be required
    for existing dependencies. Add clean-la.mk to debian/rules
    accordingly. (LP: #272665, #274732)

 -- Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden> Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:38:36 +0000

Changed in pangomm:
status: New → Fix Released
Changed in pangomm:
importance: Undecided → Low
Revision history for this message
Murray Cumming (murrayc) wrote :

I thought there was some policy not to ship .la files, not that I've seen any consistency about that.

Revision history for this message
Xiyue Deng (manphiz) wrote :

It is suggest not to ship .la files in new packages. But IIRC, for the ones already shipping them, it seems not possible to simply stop doing so before all its reverse dependencies are done, or it'll break something.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.