[FFe] Please upgrade to new upstream release

Bug #210344 reported by Matti Lindell
4
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
obex-data-server (Debian)
Fix Released
Unknown
obex-data-server (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: obex-data-server

Upstream released a minor bug-fix release today which fixes two crashers (including bug #196733). Version also adds a new feature, but overall changes look small. New 0.3.1 version is available at http://tadas.dailyda.com/software/obex-data-server-0.3.1.tar.gz

0.3.1 version
 * Fix two crashers (bugs #57, #59)
 * Add SDP record support for PBAP server (no real PBAP support yet) (bug #60)
 * Fix naming issue in configure.in

Revision history for this message
Matti Lindell (mlind) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Matti Lindell (mlind) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Matti Lindell (mlind) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Matti Lindell (mlind) wrote :
Matti Lindell (mlind)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Onkar Shinde (onkarshinde) wrote :

@Matti,

AFAIK, The new practice is to attach only .diff.gz when requesting new releases instead of interdiff. :-)

Revision history for this message
Loïc Minier (lool) wrote :

I reviewed the full diff; it looks quite reasonable, but I have to actually test the new release.

I also wonder whether the new debug message is visible in .xsession-errors.

Revision history for this message
Loïc Minier (lool) wrote :

I gave the new release a spin by merging the proposed debdiff with 0.3-0ubuntu2 from #196733 and it worked fine, I didn't get any additional debugging in .xsession-errors.

This looks good to include.

Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote :

FFe ack, please go ahead.

Changed in obex-data-server:
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Matti Lindell (mlind) wrote :

It would be reasonable to just sync the package from Debian unstable as it has the 0.3.1 version, including fixes for packaging information and a patch for more friendly usage of ods-server-test.py.

Revision history for this message
Daniel Holbach (dholbach) wrote :

Loïc: can you please take care of it?

Revision history for this message
Loïc Minier (lool) wrote :

The Debian changes are hard to review and suspicious:
obex-data-server-0.3.1/src/ods-error.h
obex-data-server-0.3.1/src/ods-error.c
obex-data-server-0.3.1/src/ods-server-session.c
obex-data-server-0.3.1/src/ods-manager.c
obex-data-server-0.3.1/src/ods-session.c
obex-data-server-0.3.1/src/ods-common.h
obex-data-server-0.3.1/src/ods-main.c
obex-data-server-0.3.1/src/ods-bluez.c
obex-data-server-0.3.1/ChangeLog
obex-data-server-0.3.1/configure.in
obex-data-server-0.3.1/configure
obex-data-server-0.3.1/debian/rules
obex-data-server-0.3.1/debian/README.examples
obex-data-server-0.3.1/debian/changelog
obex-data-server-0.3.1/debian/obex-data-server.1
obex-data-server-0.3.1/debian/control
obex-data-server-0.3.1/debian/obex-data-server.examples
obex-data-server-0.3.1/debian/compat
obex-data-server-0.3.1/debian/watch
obex-data-server-0.3.1/debian/docs
obex-data-server-0.3.1/debian/copyright
obex-data-server-0.3.1/debian/patches/000-test-server-usage.patch
obex-data-server-0.3.1/dbus-api.txt

This looks like bogus usage of $SCM; I'm rejecting the sync which sets us back to 0.3 (the Debian diff is basically reverting most of the 0.3 -> 0.3.1 release).

Revision history for this message
Loïc Minier (lool) wrote :

Unsubed -sponsors; please subscribe again when either there's a debdiff against the current version to sponsor or the package is fixed in Debian and can be synced.

Revision history for this message
Matti Lindell (mlind) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Matti Lindell (mlind) wrote :

Thanks Loïc for noticing, I overlooked the Debian changes obviously.

Revision history for this message
Loïc Minier (lool) wrote :

1) Please keep the simple-patchsys include; it's in Debian and we don't need to drop it; also it's considered intrusive to add/remove a patch system, so it's best to have it in place in case we need to -- for example -- add patches for security updates

2) Minor style remark: instead of saying that you revert all changes in 0.3-0ubuntu2, simply state that this and that patch were dropped ("because they were merged upstream" for instance); at least one reason for this is that it makes it easy to grep for the patch name to see in which revisions it was included; another reason is that I find it slightly negative to state that you revert the changes: the changes were truly needed back then! ;-)

Could you please prepare an updated debdiff (or .dsc + .diff.gz -- since your dropping files that's a bit easier to handle, didn't think of that when asking a debdiff) with at least 1) fixed? Thanks!

Revision history for this message
Matti Lindell (mlind) wrote :

Attaching required files as .tar archive

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package obex-data-server - 0.3.1-0ubuntu1

---------------
obex-data-server (0.3.1-0ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low

  * New upstream release (LP: #210344)
  * debian/control: Update Homepage URL
  * debian/patches/01_setlocale.patch,
    debian/patches/02_fix_umount_crash.patch:
    - Drop, merged upstream

 -- Matti Lindell <email address hidden> Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:47:21 +0300

Changed in obex-data-server:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Loïc Minier (lool) wrote :

Thanks!

Revision history for this message
Loïc Minier (lool) wrote :

The Debian package has been fixed; if you like you can check it again and request its sync.

Revision history for this message
Matti Lindell (mlind) wrote :

Thanks for your help Loïc!

Changed in obex-data-server:
status: Unknown → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.