FTP Transfer from whole directorys fails

Bug #205370 reported by Christian Becker
62
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gvfs
Fix Released
Medium
Suse
Fix Released
Unknown
gvfs (Fedora)
Fix Released
High
gvfs (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Low
Ubuntu Desktop Bugs
Hardy
Fix Released
Low
Ubuntu Desktop Bugs
Intrepid
Fix Released
Low
Ubuntu Desktop Bugs

Bug Description

I just want transfer a directory with ~ 30 files in there from a FTP Server.

Just copy the folder and drop it in my home directory dont work.

The error message is "Datei nicht verfügbar". Its german and means "file not accessable".

When I copy the files by hand, it works.

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Thanks for your bug report. This bug is already known upstream on http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=522933

Changed in nautilus:
assignee: nobody → desktop-bugs
importance: Undecided → Low
status: New → Triaged
Changed in gvfs:
status: Unknown → New
Revision history for this message
Laszlo Lukacs (lukacs-laci) wrote :

I experienced the same problem.

Revision history for this message
Valentin Neacsu (valentin.neacsu) wrote :

Same problem here, Hardy x86 client using Nautilus and FileZilla 0.9.25 for Windows server.

Revision history for this message
pheeror (pheeror) wrote :

Same here :-( Any chance of distributing patched version of gvfs to hardy anytime soon?

Revision history for this message
wensveen (wensveen) wrote :

I can confirm this.
This is especially annoying when the directory you want to copy has subdirectories and sub-subdirectories etc. Recursing into each directory is something the ftp client (gvfs) should do for the user. Also, the old gnome-vfs ftp client did already do this, so users might expect this to 'just work'.

Revision history for this message
In , Martin (martin-redhat-bugs) wrote :

Description of problem:
The ftp file transfer of whole directories containing more than one file fails.
The error is "Datei nicht verfügbar" which means something like "File not
available".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gvfs-0.2.3-11.fc9.i386

How reproducible:
Always

Changed in gvfs:
status: Unknown → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
In , Tomáš (tom-redhat-bugs-1) wrote :

Reproducible here, raising severity as this is a major issue.
Thanks for the link to Gnome bugzilla.

Changed in gvfs:
status: Confirmed → In Progress
Changed in gvfs:
status: New → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Savvas Radevic (medigeek) wrote :

What's the point of tracking novell and fedora? they all point to gnome's bugzilla :\

Revision history for this message
magilus (magilus) wrote :

Well it is quiet interesting which distros adopt the fix first, as the problem is of high importance to me.

Revision history for this message
In , Tomáš (tom-redhat-bugs-1) wrote :

Fix for Samba shares should be included in updated gvfs-0.2.4-1 package.
Fix for FTP is under development and will be available soon.

Revision history for this message
In , Fedora (fedora-redhat-bugs) wrote :

gvfs-0.2.4-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9

Revision history for this message
In , Fedora (fedora-redhat-bugs) wrote :

gvfs-0.2.4-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gvfs'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-5197

Changed in gvfs:
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Savvas Radevic (medigeek) wrote :

One person confirmed that it fixes the bug, let's hope we don't get any negative replies on this one:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-5197

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

the bug has been fixed upstream now

Changed in gvfs:
status: Triaged → Fix Committed
Changed in gvfs:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Changed in gvfs:
assignee: nobody → desktop-bugs
importance: Undecided → Low
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

the new stable version has been uploaded as an hardy update candidate now

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Accepted into -proposed, please test and give feedback here. Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!

Changed in gvfs:
status: Confirmed → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Jakob Unterwurzacher (jakobunt) wrote :

ZOMG. Doesn't gnome have some sort of QA?

Anyway,
-proposed fixed this for me.

Revision history for this message
Duncan Lithgow (duncan-lithgow) wrote :

@Jakob: Sure they do. It's called 'install the unstable version and test it' ;-)
@Martin: Updating with the proposed channel open fixed this bug for me.

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Copied to hardy-updates.

Changed in gvfs:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package gvfs - 0.99.3-0ubuntu1

---------------
gvfs (0.99.3-0ubuntu1) intrepid; urgency=low

  * New upstream version:
    - Fix frequent crasher in volume monitor

gvfs (0.99.2-0ubuntu1) intrepid; urgency=low

  * New upstream version:
    - Move hal and gphoto volume monitors out of process
    - Fix recursive copying (lp: #205370)
    - Require glib >= 2.17.4
    - Make the fuse daemon more reliable (lp: #235698)
    - Many smaller bugfixes
  * debian/control.in:
    - updated libglib requirement
  * debian/patches/80_samba_browsing_authentification.patch:
    - dropped since the changes create some issues
  * debian/patches/90_from_svn_fix_fuse_crasher.patch:
    - dropped since the changes are in the new version
  * updated install lists for the new version changes

 -- Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden> Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:09:03 +0200

Changed in gvfs:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Michael Nagel (nailor) wrote :

my bug ( Bug 251517 ) has been closed as duplicate. i suppose it is supposed a duplicate of this bug (found nothing better) i just wanted to add that i have a up-to-date system (as of today, august, 1st) and things are still broken.

Revision history for this message
Savvas Radevic (medigeek) wrote :

Michael, your bug seems to be private
If it's marked as a duplicate, it should say so somewhere at the beginning of the page of that bug

Post back the output of the following command (Applications > Accessories > Terminal):
apt-cache policy gvfs-backends gvfs

Revision history for this message
Michael Nagel (nailor) wrote :

the bug has been reopened as we believe it is not a duplicate currently. it has been marked private as it contains some not-for-general-public information. i'll post the output of this command there. if i can add you as a subscriber (so you can see the bug) i'll do that, too.

Revision history for this message
In , Martin (martin-redhat-bugs) wrote :

Well this has been pushed to stable, hasn't it? So I'd say it can be closed.

Revision history for this message
In , Tomáš (tom-redhat-bugs-1) wrote :

gvfs-0.2.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to stable, which includes this fix.

Changed in gvfs:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Mike (mike-prorouting) wrote :

I just found that I am running into this problem, searched google and came across this bug. I double checked that my ubuntu hardy is already up to date.

Changed in gvfs:
importance: Unknown → Medium
Changed in gvfs (Fedora):
importance: Unknown → High
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.