[BPO] rednotebook/2.29.6+ds-2 from mantic

[Phil Wyett]

[Impact]

 * Provides many fixes and enhancements.
 * As the Debian Maintainer (DM) of this package for many years, this is a service I provide in Debian.
 * Low impact. Backporting works well in Debian and the track history is sound.

[Scope]

 * Backport from mantic - 23.10.
 * Backport from future development releases where reliability/stability allows.

 * Backport to jammy - 22.04 LTS.

 * No backports to non-LTS versions - Ever. Backports are for long term users running LTS only.

 * Why a backport and not SRU? The amount of changes that benefit the user. Risk?[1]

[Other Info]

 * I am the Debian Maintainer (DM) of this package and have been for many years and will provide fixes and/or updates.
 * I am used to strictly managing the upgrade path.
 * Build has been tested and is available at: https://launchpad.net/~kathenas/+archive/ubuntu/rednotebook

[1] A python package is less dangerous to backport than others and the possible risks are low.

[Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100)]

Hello Phil! Thank you for filling in the bug and preparing the debdiff! As this seems to be an update to the backports pocket, I'll tweak the diff before sponsoring. Let me first check if the contents are sane and then proceed.

[Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100)]

Sponsored with the following changes:
 * As mentioned, targeted jammy-backports instead of jammy
 * Added bug reference for ease of review by the backports team

Now the only thing left is for the backports team to check the queue, review your upload and accepting/rejecting it. Removing ubuntu-sponsors for now.

[Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)]

approved, sorry it took so long.