Usability issues in effect preferences dialog

Bug #1947803 reported by Daniel Schürmann
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Mixxx
Confirmed
Wishlist
Unassigned
Revision history for this message
Be (be.ing) wrote :

The first screenshot would be a regression.

Revision history for this message
Be (be.ing) wrote :

Looking closer I see you reversed the order of the tabs, which would be another regression.

Changed in mixxx:
status: New → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Daniel Schürmann (daschuer) wrote :

Please describe why it is a regression.

Changed in mixxx:
status: Invalid → New
Revision history for this message
Be (be.ing) wrote :

Please describe how the proposed screenshots are an improvement.

Changed in mixxx:
status: New → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
ronso0 (ronso0) wrote :

I agree that changing one tab header to Effects Preferences while we're in Preferences > Effects is no improvement.

However, I think wecould move the Meta knob config above
the tabs because
1 increases discoverability
2 clarifies that it's not a per-tab setting

anyway, no need to discuss this NOW, we can do so AFTER merging #2618

Revision history for this message
Daniel Schürmann (daschuer) wrote :

The current GUI has some usability issues.

We have two tabs with a dual list builders.

Normally dual list builders are working with an enabled and a disabled list.
The users cam move items from one to another list and decide which item is visible.
This is the normal patten the user knows from many other applications.

Unfortunately we have implemented this only for the effects and not for the chains.
The user can not initially destingusch that there are differe use petternd implemented.

An improvement would be to replace the dual list builder for the chains with two dual list builder with something else.
For example a dual list builders for each effect rack.
They can be placed on two tabs.

We may also implement a list with checkboxes.

The UI design should clarify that there is a common storage of effect chains.

Revision history for this message
Be (be.ing) wrote :

I think the current design works well enough and I don't think it matters if users know there is a list which is a superset of both the standard effect chain preset list and the quick effect chain preset list. I think splitting those two lists into separate tabs might be a small improvement. I won't be working on that, but I wouldn't have an objection to changing the design that way.

A list with checkboxes would not be appropriate. A simple list that can be dragged and dropped is sufficient.

Changed in mixxx:
status: Won't Fix → Opinion
summary: - Effect Preferences dialog can make use of a redesign
+ Usability issues in effect preferences dialog
Revision history for this message
Daniel Schürmann (daschuer) wrote :

I have set this to confirmed wishlist, that this does not fall from the shelf.

Changed in mixxx:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: Opinion → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Swiftb0y (swiftb0y) wrote :

Mixxx now uses GitHub for bug tracking. This bug has been migrated to:
https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/issues/10566

lock status: Metadata changes locked and limited to project staff
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.