Please sync various bits of geda 1.4.0 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

Bug #191441 reported by William Grant
4
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
geda (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned
geda-doc (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned
geda-examples (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned
geda-gattrib (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned
geda-gnetlist (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned
geda-gschem (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned
geda-gsymcheck (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned
geda-symbols (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned
geda-utils (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned
libgeda (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned

Bug Description

Please sync libgeda, geda-doc, geda-examples, geda-gnetlist, geda-gschem, geda-gsymcheck, geda-symbols, geda-utils 1:1.4.0-1 and geda-gattrib 1:1.4.0-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

They all build and work fine, and none have Ubuntu modifications.

There is a libgeda SONAME transition, but libgeda is not used outside upstream (from which all these source packages come).

William Grant (wgrant)
description: updated
Changed in geda-doc:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in geda-examples:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in geda-gattrib:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in geda-gnetlist:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in geda-gschem:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in geda-gsymcheck:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in geda-symbols:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in geda-utils:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in libgeda:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Peter Clifton (pcjc2) wrote :

I've added the gEDA meta-package, since this has also had its version bumped to 1.4.0, and has a new dependancy on package "extra-xdg-menus".

Revision history for this message
Peter Clifton (pcjc2) wrote :

Turns out the geda meta-package should have had an extra "Recommends" on "extra-xdg-menus" (see its changelog), however there was no change to the package's control file. I've sent a message to the Debian maintainer to try and get that fixed.

("extra-xdg-menus" is not yet in Ubuntu, but I just filed a sync request)

Revision history for this message
Aanjhan Ranganathan (aanjhan) wrote :

just for information and easy to follow up.
the new package sync request is files as bug 191556

Changed in geda:
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
William Grant (wgrant) wrote :

Sync request of geda also acked.

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote : Synced

Package(s) synced.

Changed in libgeda:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Changed in geda:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Changed in geda-doc:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Changed in geda-examples:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Changed in geda-gattrib:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Changed in geda-gnetlist:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Changed in geda-gschem:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Changed in geda-gsymcheck:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Changed in geda-symbols:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Changed in geda-utils:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.