[amd64] Building of architecture-independent parts (docs) of Ghostscript not stable against small toolchain changes
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ghostscript (Debian) |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
ghostscript (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Martin Pitt |
Bug Description
Binary package hint: ghostscript
I have built a new Ghostscript package to apply a small patch to the code of the IJS interface. This does not add or remove files in the binary package and also no documentation files are modified and debian/rules was also not modified.
When installing the new packages a conflict gets reported:
dpkg: warning - old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ...
dpkg: ... it looks like that went OK.
Unpacking replacement ghostscript ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
till@till-
Related branches
Changed in ghostscript: | |
importance: | Undecided → High |
milestone: | none → hardy-alpha-4 |
assignee: | nobody → pitti |
Changed in ghostscript: | |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in ghostscript: | |
status: | Unknown → New |
Changed in ghostscript: | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
This bug was fixed in the package ghostscript - 8.61.dfsg. 1-0ubuntu5
--------------- 1-0ubuntu5) hardy; urgency=low
ghostscript (8.61.dfsg.
* debian/rules: Do not ship README.gz in ghostscript, it collides with -doc. (LP: #185602, Debian #460692)
ghostscript
-- Martin Pitt <email address hidden> Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:11:03 +0100