Ubuntu
transmission package

Please sponsor transmission 0.96 into Hardy

Bug #176493 reported by Pedro Fragoso on 2007-12-15

This bug report is a duplicate of: Bug #177806: Please sync transmission 0.96.dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). Edit Remove

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	transmission (Debian)	Fix Released	Unknown	debbugs #456228
	transmission (Ubuntu)	Incomplete	Undecided	Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: transmission

New upstream.

Revision history for this message

Pedro Fragoso (ember) wrote on 2007-12-15:

transmission_0.96-0ubuntu1.interdiff Edit (2.3 KiB, text/plain)

http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=1005

Revision history for this message

John Dong (jdong) wrote on 2007-12-15:

The Debian maintainer is generally pretty fast at updating transmission. If they do not respond in a reasonable timeframe, then we can do it ourselves, but for now I'd rather not diverge from Debian just so that we can be a few days faster.

Revision history for this message

Pedro Fragoso (ember) wrote on 2007-12-15:

I forwarded to Debian too.

Revision history for this message

Emmet Hikory (persia) wrote on 2007-12-16:

I've unsubscribed ubuntu-universe-sponsors based on the developer feedback above. Please resubscribe if upload of this candidate is later requested.

Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2007-12-17

Changed in transmission:
status:	Unknown → New

Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2007-12-18

Changed in transmission:
status:	New → Fix Released

Pedro Fragoso (ember) on 2007-12-18

Changed in transmission:
status:	New → Invalid

Revision history for this message

Emmet Hikory (persia) wrote on 2007-12-18:

This doesn't appear to be an invalid request, as we've passed DIF. It is however not currently a complete sync request. When the debian adjustments are complete (or if there is extended delay), please revisit this bug and either present a new candidate for upload or retitle & edit the description to match a sync. If I am mistaken, and there is a strong reason not to include 0.96 in hardy, please reset to Invalid, and provide an explanation as to why this shouldn't be done.