Please update to the newer version of patchelf in bionic
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
patchelf (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Xenial |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
[Impact]
* New architecture support in xenial where the current version has FTBS e.g.; armhf, s390x
* The new code adds logic to reorder Program Headers appropriately.
* New feature (specific flag, --no-default-lib) to disable LD_LIBRARY_PATH
[Test Case]
* Use snapcraft's test suite which is a heavy user of patchelf.
* snapcraft's test suite on the new architectures
* patchelf's integrated tests
* exploratory testing of patchelf.
[Regression Potential]
* Minimal possibility of patching to break on obscure binaries
* 0.9-1 has already been available on artful and bionic with no bugs reported
* No deb dependes on patchelf, snapcraft installs patchelf during runtime
during runtime due to the FTBS. This would change that.
[Other Info]
* NixOS upstream https:/
* Current version in artful and bionic: 0.9-1
* Current version in xenial: 0.8-4. With FTBS for armhf and s390x
description: | updated |
no longer affects: | patchelf (Ubuntu Bionic) |
summary: |
- Please update to a newer version of patchelf + Please update to the newer version of patchelf in bionic |
no longer affects: | patchelf (Ubuntu Artful) |
description: | updated |
Changed in patchelf (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
Hello Sergio, or anyone else affected,
Accepted patchelf into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https:/ /launchpad. net/ubuntu/ +source/ patchelf/ 0.9-1~ubuntu16. 04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/Testing/ EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from verification- needed- xenial to verification- done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed- xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/QATeam/ PerformingSRUVe rification . Thank you in advance!