Can't handle Multi-Arch: no
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
dose3 (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Trusty |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Iain Lane |
Bug Description
[ Description ]
Multi-Arch: no is valid, but dose-distcheck gives a fatal error when it's encountered.
[ Proposed fix ]
Add "no" as a valid value, as for "none".
[ QA ]
Add a vivid deb line to sources.list on a trusty system.
(trusty-
Fatal error: exception Format822.
(trusty-
# […]
(trusty-
background-
foreground-
total-packages: 8482
broken-packages: 18
[ Regression potential ]
Adds a new accepted value to a case which is already handled. Could be that erroneous values are no longer rejected.
[ Development fix ]
Fixed in 3.2.2-3, which is in vivid.
Related branches
Changed in dose3 (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
Changed in dose3 (Ubuntu Trusty): | |
status: | New → In Progress |
assignee: | nobody → Iain Lane (laney) |
Hello Iain, or anyone else affected,
Accepted dose3 into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http:// launchpad. net/ubuntu/ +source/ dose3/3. 1.3-7ubuntu0. 1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/Testing/ EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/QATeam/ PerformingSRUVe rification . Thank you in advance!