gnome-contacts-search-provider crashed with signal 5 in g_variant_new_va()

Bug #1060518 reported by Pedro Nariyoshi
22
This bug affects 4 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnome-contacts (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Contacts crashes if I change some contact information using browser.
I don't know if that's the only cause, but this happened to me recently

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: gnome-contacts 3.6.0-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-16.25-generic 3.5.4
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-16-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Oct 2 18:16:08 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gnome-contacts/gnome-contacts-search-provider
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gnome-contacts/gnome-contacts-search-provider
Signal: 5
SourcePackage: gnome-contacts
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_variant_new_va () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_variant_new () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
Title: gnome-contacts-search-provider crashed with signal 5 in g_variant_new_va()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm audio cdrom dialout dip fax floppy fuse lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare scanner sudo tape video

Revision history for this message
Pedro Nariyoshi (pedro-nariyoshi) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1033262, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
Revision history for this message
Pedro Nariyoshi (pedro-nariyoshi) wrote : Re: [Bug 1060518] Re: gnome-contacts-search-provider crashed with signal 5 in g_variant_new_va()
Download full text (3.4 KiB)

I can't access bug 1033262, is it not public yet?
Pedro Nariyoshi

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Apport retracing service <
<email address hidden>> wrote:

> *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1033262 ***
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033262
>
> Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
> this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
> and is a duplicate of bug #1033262, so is being marked as such. Please
> look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information
> that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
> Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
> the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may
> find.
>
> ** Attachment removed: "CoreDump.gz"
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060518/+attachment/3366642/+files/CoreDump.gz
>
> ** Attachment removed: "Disassembly.txt"
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060518/+attachment/3366644/+files/Disassembly.txt
>
> ** Attachment removed: "ProcMaps.txt"
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060518/+attachment/3366646/+files/ProcMaps.txt
>
> ** Attachment removed: "ProcStatus.txt"
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060518/+attachment/3366647/+files/ProcStatus.txt
>
> ** Attachment removed: "Registers.txt"
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060518/+attachment/3366648/+files/Registers.txt
>
> ** Attachment removed: "Stacktrace.txt"
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060518/+attachment/3366649/+files/Stacktrace.txt
>
> ** Attachment removed: "ThreadStacktrace.txt"
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060518/+attachment/3366650/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt
>
> ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of private bug 1033262
>
> ** Visibility changed to: Public
>
> ** Tags removed: need-amd64-retrace
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060518
>
> Title:
> gnome-contacts-search-provider crashed with signal 5 in
> g_variant_new_va()
>
> Status in “gnome-contacts” package in Ubuntu:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> Contacts crashes if I change some contact information using browser.
> I don't know if that's the only cause, but this happened to me recently
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
> Package: gnome-contacts 3.6.0-0ubuntu1
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-16.25-generic 3.5.4
> Uname: Linux 3.5.0-16-generic x86_64
> ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu1
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Tue Oct 2 18:16:08 2012
> ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gnome-contacts/gnome-contacts-search-provider
> ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gnome-contacts/gnome-contacts-search-provider
> Signal: 5
> SourcePackage: gnome-contacts
> StacktraceTop:
> ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
> ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
> ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
> g_variant_new_va () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
> g_variant_new () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
> Title: gnome-contacts-search-provider crashed with signal 5 in
> g_variant_new_va()
> UpgradeStatu...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in gnome-contacts (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
valmar (valmar-lp) wrote :

Even before the search provider crashes, it seems that Gnome Shell cannot search for contacts correctly, if in the activities screen I start typing a contact name, sometimes the contact appears in the search results, sometime it doesn't. This happens every time and without the crash described in this bug...

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.