Comment 6 for bug 404047

No, there is no sftp support: I'm running DropBear, which is a ssh server
with low memory usage. Therefore, it is suitable for NAS or media devices.
However, it has not built-in support for sftp (although it seems it can be
added with a hack, but I did not succeed).
Bottom line: no sftp support ;-).

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 23:46, John A Meinel <email address hidden> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ernst wrote:
> > Thanks for your answer :-)
> > For me, this means:
> > 1) http only provides read only access (so no good solution)
> > 2) I only have ssh access (not sftp) and cannot start bzr server
> >
> > This means, atm there is no solution for me?
>
> Well, ftp *works* it is just slow.
>
> >
> > I'm trying to get sftp working, but I did not succeed yet.
> >
>
>
> I'm a bit surprised here. Perhaps you were expecting to be able to use a
> relative url? For example:
>
> bzr log sftp://myhost/home/jameinel/myproject
>
> versus potentially (but wouldn't work):
> bzr log myhost:myproject
> bzr log sftp://myhost/myproject
>
> (though bzr log sftp://myhost/~/myproject should work)
>
> In general, does an sftp client work? Or is there just no sftp support on
> the
> server?
>
> John
> =:->
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFKaivEJdeBCYSNAAMRAmktAKDYNhk0cr0ITcGAA/PAWLmuk9fPqwCglV7C
> ENuphQShgk2KaKdSSPLXrDw=
> =dD4t
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> bzr update takes ages over FTP
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404047
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>