Comment 2 for bug 35947
Revision history for this message
| Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote Re: [Bug 35947] deprecated_function should offer an explanation | #2 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 03:08 +0000, Ian Bicking wrote:
> Public bug reported:
> https:/
>
> Affects: bzr (upstream)
> Severity: Normal
> Priority: (none set)
> Status: Unconfirmed
>
> Description:
> There should be an optional (but generally used) second argument to
> deprecated_function that suggests what should be used in lieu of the
> deprecated function.
>
> My first thought seeing a deprecation: deprecated for what?
Thats a good point. We have been putting that in the docstring as Aaron
says, but having it in the decorator still allows it to be put in the
docstring (by the decorator) and does not mean it needs to be put in the
Warning: output.
Patches accepted :).
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://