Breezy

  1. Bug #235441
  2. Comment #1

Comment 1 for bug 235441

Revision history for this message
Aaron Bentley (abentley) wrote : Re: [Bug 235441] [NEW] lca doesn't report delete + change as conflict

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

mhosken wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> In the developer documentation on the LCA merge algorithm it describes a
> difference between LCA and merge3 whereby LCA does not report that
> delete + change is a conflict. It also states that reporting it this way
> is a core value for the LCA algorithm

It's a conceptual bug in LCA. It's not considered desirable.

> (See section Algorithm point 3).
> Are there plans to fix this in LCA (or weave for that matter)?

Not yet. First we have figure out the right way to tweak the algorithm
to make it do what we want. The two options that present themselves are:
- - Make it actually based on a merge3 merger
- - Make it an edge-based merger

Both are fairly significant changes.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIPdvB0F+nu1YWqI0RArV0AJ4gmxqppoEZDTb+N5ZAToA5vang2gCfdnrS
1HiS7XPnMKF8p+ytZsKDigY=
=OPmN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----