Comment 7 for bug 499684
Revision history for this message
| Scott Kitterman (kitterman) wrote Re: [Bug 499684] Re: Interface to dpkg-buildpackage inconsistent and not well documented | #7 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
a60fb26
(Get the code!)
Currently to pass the equivalent of dpkg-buildpackakge -S -sa -us -uc one
would use -S -- -sa -us -uc. This could stand being de-uglified. I think
"You are talking to bzr-builddeb before the -- and dpkg-buildpackage after"
would at least be more consistent. Personally, I think the reverse makes more
sense, but if bzr won't support it, then it won't.