Comment 18 for bug 1592612

That would put the control of access to the secrets in the hands of Octavia itself. Michael can speak to whether he thinks this is a good idea, though I don't see anything wrong with it. Note that in order for Octavia to ensure that secrets are not shared across projects, Octavia needs to know the secret's project_id. Presently the barbican API doesn't list the secret's project_id when the meta-data is accessed. I've opened an RFE bug which would solve this problem for us, and allow Octavia (and other 3rd party services) to ensure that secrets are not shared across projects: https://bugs.launchpad.net/barbican/+bug/1629511