Baltix
tuxpaint package

  1. Bug #82510
  2. Comment #14

Comment 14 for bug 82510

Revision history for this message
Caroline Ford (secretlondon) wrote : Re: [Bug 82510] Re: [Edgy]tuxpaint-stamps should not depend upon tuxpaint-data

On 31/03/2008, Jordan Mantha <email address hidden> wrote:
> Caroline, sorry for taking so long to look at this. It would seem to me
> that we would want to drop the dependency on tuxpaint-stamps-default in
> tuxpaint-data, not the other way around as your debdiff does. My
> understanding of the bug is that you want to be able to install tuxpaint
> and tuxpaint-data without necessarily having the stamps around, correct?

Taking to upstream we decided this way round. The program can be used
without the stamps, and the stamps can be used without the program
tbh.

However the other way round does seem to make more sense. The problem
is the circular dependency which stops people installing the program
using gdebi, and stops the distribution of the program without using a
repository.