> Now that grub2 is the default, do we want to mark this as wontfix, or
> migrate this bug report to the grub2 component?
I doubt that we'll take the gfxboot approach, but grub2 has its own
graphics support and so I expect that we'll eventually get something
based on that (although we will still be aiming to have a silent boot
loader by default). I much prefer the idea of an upstream-supported
solution here.
Even if we weren't going to do it, I'd rather leave this bug open;
enough people have been asking for it that, if I closed it, somebody
would just file it again anyway. :-)
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 06:11:40PM -0000, will_in_wi wrote: /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ grub2/+ bug/386047
> Created another bug report suggesting said improvement:
> https:/
Thanks.
> Now that grub2 is the default, do we want to mark this as wontfix, or
> migrate this bug report to the grub2 component?
I doubt that we'll take the gfxboot approach, but grub2 has its own
graphics support and so I expect that we'll eventually get something
based on that (although we will still be aiming to have a silent boot
loader by default). I much prefer the idea of an upstream-supported
solution here.
Even if we weren't going to do it, I'd rather leave this bug open;
enough people have been asking for it that, if I closed it, somebody
would just file it again anyway. :-)