I've asked on #ubuntu-devel about whether we should provide the stable release through -updates or -backports.
The consensus has been that there should be a list of high-impact (SRU-able) bugs and only those should then get addressed.
"Having a release candidate is not professional" is apparently no argument really.
So, if you want to see a bugfix update for Gutsy, you might want to get involved in triaging the gimp bugs..
I've asked on #ubuntu-devel about whether we should provide the stable release through -updates or -backports.
The consensus has been that there should be a list of high-impact (SRU-able) bugs and only those should then get addressed.
"Having a release candidate is not professional" is apparently no argument really.
So, if you want to see a bugfix update for Gutsy, you might want to get involved in triaging the gimp bugs..
Bruce Cowan provides a backport already in his PPA: https:/ /edge.launchpad .net/~bruce89/ +archive /wiki.ubuntu. com/SRU
See also https:/