If you need more details to make it work, I suggest that we exchange
information directly (for example via private email), because those
details are probably not relevant for the bug report.
I have a Thinkpad T42 with a Pentium M 1.7 GHz myself, so it will be
valuable to get test results from your x41, t41, and last but not least t40.
And in the end, we can publish your results in the list of tested CPUs
(in the wiki) and more verbose at the bug report.
Best regards
sudodus
On 2013-05-20 04:23, Greg Weber wrote:
> I have 2 or three pentium m systems to test on. may i help out with testing
> sodudus? (I have ibm thinkpad x41, t41, and maybe a t40 that only works on
> power cord/battery one or other)
>
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:51 PM, sudodus <email address hidden> wrote:
>
>> On 2013-05-19 19:22, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
>>>> The reason why I want people to
>>>> check the address size is the we are working around the check, that
>>>> should make it impossible to boot a non-pae CPU with a pae kernel.
>>>
>>> Fake -PAE bypasses the check to stop dpkg installing a PAE kernel. But,
>>> even after that, the PAE kernel won't boot on a non-PAE CPU. PAE is not
>>> something that gets enabled (or disabled) at runtime, it is actually a
>>> replacement of functions in the kernel source (#ifdef .. #endif etc.),
>>> so if you have a PAE kernel it will not boot on non-PAE. So it makes no
>>> sense to ask people to check the address size on a CPU that has already
>>> booted a PAE kernel, since the fact that it successfully booted a PAE
>>> kernel means it must support PAE. (afaik - this is from the
>>> documentation, I do not have a non-Pentium-M non-PAE system to test
>>> with)
>>>
>> I see your point. I will look for some links, that support what you say,
>> and change the text accordingly. If you have a link available, please
>> send it to me :-)
>>
>> Can you explain why the non-pae ubuntu code reports 32 bits physical
>> memory, while the pae code reports 36 bits? Some people say it should
>> report the same. But there is a difference on the computers I have tested.
>>
>> -o-
>>
>> If it is the general truth that non-pae CPUs won't boot at all, it is
>> even harder to understand why the Pentium M CPUs are excluded by the
>> Ubuntu developers. Why are those tests implemented (in syslinux), or why
>> are they shutting down, and not only printing the message?
>>
>> --
>> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
>> duplicate bug report (1058748).
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930447
>>
>> Title:
>> Unable to start Ubuntu 12.04 live CD with syslinux loader on Pentium M
>> x86 Laptop due to bug in PAE kernel, initramfs or syslinux
>>
>> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/930447/+subscriptions
>>
>
Hi Greg,
You are very welcome to test fake-PAE :-)
You find the information at this link
https:/ /help.ubuntu. com/community/ Lubuntu- fake-PAE
Look at it all, then decide which way you want to go
https:/ /help.ubuntu. com/community/ grub-n- iso /help.ubuntu. com/community/ InstalledSystem FakePAE /help.ubuntu. com/community/ PAE
or
https:/
or mörgæs's way
https:/
If you need more details to make it work, I suggest that we exchange
information directly (for example via private email), because those
details are probably not relevant for the bug report.
I have a Thinkpad T42 with a Pentium M 1.7 GHz myself, so it will be
valuable to get test results from your x41, t41, and last but not least t40.
And in the end, we can publish your results in the list of tested CPUs
(in the wiki) and more verbose at the bug report.
Best regards
sudodus
On 2013-05-20 04:23, Greg Weber wrote: /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 930447 /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ linux/+ bug/930447/ +subscriptions
> I have 2 or three pentium m systems to test on. may i help out with testing
> sodudus? (I have ibm thinkpad x41, t41, and maybe a t40 that only works on
> power cord/battery one or other)
>
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:51 PM, sudodus <email address hidden> wrote:
>
>> On 2013-05-19 19:22, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
>>>> The reason why I want people to
>>>> check the address size is the we are working around the check, that
>>>> should make it impossible to boot a non-pae CPU with a pae kernel.
>>>
>>> Fake -PAE bypasses the check to stop dpkg installing a PAE kernel. But,
>>> even after that, the PAE kernel won't boot on a non-PAE CPU. PAE is not
>>> something that gets enabled (or disabled) at runtime, it is actually a
>>> replacement of functions in the kernel source (#ifdef .. #endif etc.),
>>> so if you have a PAE kernel it will not boot on non-PAE. So it makes no
>>> sense to ask people to check the address size on a CPU that has already
>>> booted a PAE kernel, since the fact that it successfully booted a PAE
>>> kernel means it must support PAE. (afaik - this is from the
>>> documentation, I do not have a non-Pentium-M non-PAE system to test
>>> with)
>>>
>> I see your point. I will look for some links, that support what you say,
>> and change the text accordingly. If you have a link available, please
>> send it to me :-)
>>
>> Can you explain why the non-pae ubuntu code reports 32 bits physical
>> memory, while the pae code reports 36 bits? Some people say it should
>> report the same. But there is a difference on the computers I have tested.
>>
>> -o-
>>
>> If it is the general truth that non-pae CPUs won't boot at all, it is
>> even harder to understand why the Pentium M CPUs are excluded by the
>> Ubuntu developers. Why are those tests implemented (in syslinux), or why
>> are they shutting down, and not only printing the message?
>>
>> --
>> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
>> duplicate bug report (1058748).
>> https:/
>>
>> Title:
>> Unable to start Ubuntu 12.04 live CD with syslinux loader on Pentium M
>> x86 Laptop due to bug in PAE kernel, initramfs or syslinux
>>
>> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>> https:/
>>
>