Please note, I am not a Core Developer and cannot upload your update.
= FTBFS (kind-of) =
- when build in debian sid chroot, current debian & updated ubuntu packages fail to build from source, due to changes in dh_builddeb. I filed this as a debian bug with a patch http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673283 . It doesn't affect quantal yet, but it might come back to us later.
= debian/changelog =
- Would be helpful to note why certain patches are dropped from ubuntu packaging. I had to investigate again myself. E.g.:
* Dropped changes:
- debian/patches/04-werror.patch - included upstream
- debian/patches/05-fix-ld.patch - applied in debian
- 09-unused-warnings.patch - included upstream
symlinking /sbin/fsck.btrfs to /bin/true:
Upstream claims:
* Latest btrfs-progs (c. 26 Mar 2012)
- btrfsck can now repair some forms of filesystem breakage
Maybe there is some value in using btrfsck as fsck.btrfs?
Please note, I am not a Core Developer and cannot upload your update.
= FTBFS (kind-of) = bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 673283 . It doesn't affect quantal yet, but it might come back to us later.
- when build in debian sid chroot, current debian & updated ubuntu packages fail to build from source, due to changes in dh_builddeb. I filed this as a debian bug with a patch http://
= debian/changelog = patches/ 04-werror. patch - included upstream patches/ 05-fix- ld.patch - applied in debian warnings. patch - included upstream
- Would be helpful to note why certain patches are dropped from ubuntu packaging. I had to investigate again myself. E.g.:
* Dropped changes:
- debian/
- debian/
- 09-unused-
symlinking /sbin/fsck.btrfs to /bin/true:
Upstream claims:
* Latest btrfs-progs (c. 26 Mar 2012)
- btrfsck can now repair some forms of filesystem breakage
Maybe there is some value in using btrfsck as fsck.btrfs?