(In reply to comment #51)
> my understanding is that CDDL programs are fine for distributing inside Fedora
> and that licenses identified as "good" could be in the main repositories as
> well. CDDL is also a valid license value when checking packages with rpmlint.
(In reply to comment #51)
> my understanding is that CDDL programs are fine for distributing inside Fedora
> and that licenses identified as "good" could be in the main repositories as
> well. CDDL is also a valid license value when checking packages with rpmlint.
You're right that CDDL itself isn't problem, but combination of CDDL and GPL code seems to be (see http:// www.redhat. com/archives/ fedora- legal-list/ 2009-July/ msg00000. html).
> Do you know which list among the many provided of the Fedora Project is the
> right one?
I'd go for the devel list.