Chris Coulson [2011-07-19 9:20 -0000]:
> Also, the example of using groups to control device access is pretty
> much obsolete now, as this is mostly done using ACL's with udev-
> acl/consolekit, rather than using unix groups - I don't even think the
> fax group is used anymore (there is no udev rule which sets device nodes
> to that group name)
That's right. The only groups that are still relevant are adm, admin,
lpadmin, and sambashare.
Chris Coulson [2011-07-19 9:20 -0000]:
> Also, the example of using groups to control device access is pretty
> much obsolete now, as this is mostly done using ACL's with udev-
> acl/consolekit, rather than using unix groups - I don't even think the
> fax group is used anymore (there is no udev rule which sets device nodes
> to that group name)
That's right. The only groups that are still relevant are adm, admin,
lpadmin, and sambashare.
Martin
-- www.piware. de
Martin Pitt | http://
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)