Comment 79 for bug 733349

I do not get this. It sounds to me like some kind of Win/Mac clone
speech. You seriously want to say to community "a Dock CAN'T"... I
thought Linux was better than that, it was built to "CAN". Minimizing
application is logical, it is reasonable it has been done before. Just
give us somewhere option "dock will behave as expected" so I can
enable it and disable default "no can't do for no reason" behavior.

BTW: @JC, @Michael: behavior like that would not be intuitive in my
opinion, complicated and inconsistent.

PS: Unity is inconsistent anyways. There is many things. For example,
how come if I go to application's menu (ex: Firefox -> View ->
Toolbar) it will show submenu by itself without clicking, but
subsequent click will hide that submenu? (I get so mad on slowed-down
submenu when I by mistake click on it, thereby hiding it). And each
click will either reveal or hide submenu. So that is OK? I do not
think that user cares about names of different parts of desktop. I
thought it should be simple clean, intuitive, expected, obvious and
CONSISTENT.