For those interested, Jono wrote a piece:
http://www.jonobacon.org/2011/03/28/balancing-freedom-and-functionality-a-design-challenge/
The post itself includes a highlighted screenshot of the installer screen in question:
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5187/5568269623_e74672f3f5_z.jpg
The most intriguing suggestion mentioned on that blog is a (very beautiful) mockup, showing a slider from "free" to "non-free":
All free software → proprietary drivers ↔ MP3 ↔ DVD ↔ Flash ← All non-free software http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/3886/captureqc.png
This would make the choice less binary; and allow the installer to call-out at edge level what the impact on the user-experience would be.
For those interested, Jono wrote a piece:
http:// www.jonobacon. org/2011/ 03/28/balancing -freedom- and-functionali ty-a-design- challenge/
The post itself includes a highlighted screenshot of the installer screen in question:
http:// farm6.static. flickr. com/5187/ 5568269623_ e74672f3f5_ z.jpg
The most intriguing suggestion mentioned on that blog is a (very beautiful) mockup, showing a slider from "free" to "non-free":
All free software → proprietary drivers ↔ MP3 ↔ DVD ↔ Flash ← All non-free software img638. imageshack. us/img638/ 3886/captureqc. png
http://
This would make the choice less binary; and allow the installer to call-out at edge level what the impact on the user-experience would be.