Comment 135 for bug 390508
Revision history for this message
| Marco Chiappero (mchiappero) wrote Re: [Bug 390508] Re: notify-send ignores the expire timeout parameter | #135 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
Il 07/07/2010 23:20, Sebastien Bacher ha scritto:
> Could you take those discussions somewhere else as requested before?
Where?
> You
> disagree on the design choices there and don't see the value in having a
> system working on a consistent way
No, and I'm not the only one. You seem quite sure that the ubuntu team
is always right and the (l)users are always wrong and, being stupid,
can't comprehend the great design behind notify-osd. At the moment I've
never read a word explaining what "consistent way" means and what it is
useful for. Where is the "value"? In what? Where is the value when lots
of people complain about it?
Instead, I already explained why it is much more reasonable, useful and
natural to let the client chose the right (yes, the right) timeout. The
DNS suggests the same.
> but it's the choice Ubuntu did for
> its notification system, you are free to use other softwares to replace
> this one or other system if you decide this one doesn't fit your needs,
Sure, but we are talking about notify-osd.
> arguing over and over using the same arguments will not bring any
> addition value to the discussion
Are you referring at your own messages? Well, this time I agree with you.