-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 4/20/2012 1:04 PM, Jussi Kekkonen wrote: > How that is a bad idea? >
It is an explicit decision to use APGLv3 and not AGPLv3+, I'm not specifically responsible for the license chosen, but that was the decision.
John =:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+RVuwACgkQJdeBCYSNAAN5JwCcDYfCXUMKJFl/1yya2Q2iNAwd vaUAnRch/IITy7cgpzjmrZz197aPcE5U =QFOR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 4/20/2012 1:04 PM, Jussi Kekkonen wrote:
> How that is a bad idea?
>
It is an explicit decision to use APGLv3 and not AGPLv3+, I'm not
specifically responsible for the license chosen, but that was the
decision.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org/
RVuwACgkQJdeBCY SNAAN5JwCcDYfCX UMKJFl/ 1yya2Q2iNAwd IITy7cgpzjmrZz1 97aPcE5U
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAk+
vaUAnRch/
=QFOR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----