I agree Amoor; this bug is critical but it is the release of Maverick with bugs like #160311 that really makes me nervous about the future fit and finish of the Ubuntu packaged GNOME desktop (to say nothing of the ghastly state of Unity in 10.10). I accept that re-installing Lucid would resolve most of the issues encountered with 10.10 but I'm baffled as to why Canonical aren't making a public effort to repair the credibility damage the presence of this bug and others in a "release" version has done to them.
So how is the backport of this fix from samba.org into the Ubuntu libsmbclient coming along?
I agree Amoor; this bug is critical but it is the release of Maverick with bugs like #160311 that really makes me nervous about the future fit and finish of the Ubuntu packaged GNOME desktop (to say nothing of the ghastly state of Unity in 10.10). I accept that re-installing Lucid would resolve most of the issues encountered with 10.10 but I'm baffled as to why Canonical aren't making a public effort to repair the credibility damage the presence of this bug and others in a "release" version has done to them.
So how is the backport of this fix from samba.org into the Ubuntu libsmbclient coming along?