On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 04:17:39PM -0000, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> I think Product Management should be involved then, because we are
> releasing Pro for arm64 on xenial, and have been for a while. We
> therefore should test it on arm64 (and the other architectures we
> release it on).
Perhaps what you mean is that we publish the ubuntu-advantage-tools package
on arm64 in xenial.
But it's an architecture: all package, so per-arch tests are of little
significance. And xenial/arm64 is out of security support. So no users
should be running xenial on arm64, and arm64 autopkgtests shouldn't be a
blocker.
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 04:17:39PM -0000, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> I think Product Management should be involved then, because we are
> releasing Pro for arm64 on xenial, and have been for a while. We
> therefore should test it on arm64 (and the other architectures we
> release it on).
Perhaps what you mean is that we publish the ubuntu- advantage- tools package
on arm64 in xenial.
But it's an architecture: all package, so per-arch tests are of little
significance. And xenial/arm64 is out of security support. So no users
should be running xenial on arm64, and arm64 autopkgtests shouldn't be a
blocker.